Skip to content
A two-week audit, not a vibe check

QA audits that show you exactly where quality breaks down

Most teams know quality is a problem somewhere. Fewer can point to exactly where. GoGreenlit runs a structured two-week audit across your process, tooling, and coverage, and hands back a prioritized roadmap instead of a list of complaints.

A page from an example audit report

Area
CoverageGap found
Evidence
Critical checkout flows have no automated check.
Recommendation
Add a regression check for each critical flow, owned by QA.

Signs

Signs you are overdue for a QA audit

None of these feel urgent on their own. Together, they usually mean nobody has an accurate picture of your actual risk anymore.

Six domains

What a QA audit covers

Six domains, each reviewed independently so a weakness in one does not hide behind strength in another.

Process

How testing actually happens today: when it starts, who owns it, and what triggers a release decision.

Tooling

Whether your test management, automation, and CI tools fit your stack, or are being worked around.

Coverage

What is actually tested versus assumed to be fine, mapped against where your real risk sits.

Documentation

Whether test cases and process docs describe the product you ship today, or one from two quarters ago.

Team skills

Where the team's QA capability is strong, and where a skills gap is quietly shaping what gets tested.

Reporting

Whether the metrics you track actually predict release risk, or just look good in a dashboard.

Day by day

How the audit runs, day by day

  1. 1

    Kickoff and discovery (days 1-4)

    Interviews with engineering and product, plus a first pass through your existing test documentation and tooling.

  2. 2

    Independent analysis (days 5-8)

    A structured review against all six audit domains, without sitting in on your day-to-day so findings stay objective.

  3. 3

    Report writing (days 9-12)

    Findings get written up with severity ratings and turned into a prioritized, sequenced roadmap.

  4. 4

    Findings presentation (days 13-14)

    A walkthrough of the report with your team, and a working session on what to tackle first.

Deliverables

What you get from the audit

Executive summary

The headline findings, written for whoever is making the budget and headcount calls.

Detailed findings by domain

Every finding rated by severity, with a recommended action attached.

Coverage gap analysis

Exactly where testing is not happening, mapped against actual product risk.

90-day roadmap

Ten to fifteen sequenced initiatives, ranked by impact against effort, so quick wins and structural fixes are both visible.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

Ready to find out exactly where quality is breaking down?

Tell us about your team and your current release process. We will scope a two-week audit in one call.