QA audits that show you exactly where quality breaks down
Most teams know quality is a problem somewhere. Fewer can point to exactly where. GoGreenlit runs a structured two-week audit across your process, tooling, and coverage, and hands back a prioritized roadmap instead of a list of complaints.
A page from an example audit report
- Area
- CoverageGap found
- Evidence
- Critical checkout flows have no automated check.
- Recommendation
- Add a regression check for each critical flow, owned by QA.
Signs
Signs you are overdue for a QA audit
None of these feel urgent on their own. Together, they usually mean nobody has an accurate picture of your actual risk anymore.
- Nobody can say with confidence what percentage of the product is actually covered by tests
- The same category of defect keeps escaping to production, and no one has traced why
- The team or stack has changed significantly since anyone last reviewed the QA process end to end
- Coverage and quality metrics get reported every sprint, but nobody has checked whether they predict anything real
- Leadership is asking for a quality plan, and the honest answer is that one does not exist in writing
Six domains
What a QA audit covers
Six domains, each reviewed independently so a weakness in one does not hide behind strength in another.
Process
How testing actually happens today: when it starts, who owns it, and what triggers a release decision.
Tooling
Whether your test management, automation, and CI tools fit your stack, or are being worked around.
Coverage
What is actually tested versus assumed to be fine, mapped against where your real risk sits.
Documentation
Whether test cases and process docs describe the product you ship today, or one from two quarters ago.
Team skills
Where the team's QA capability is strong, and where a skills gap is quietly shaping what gets tested.
Reporting
Whether the metrics you track actually predict release risk, or just look good in a dashboard.
Day by day
How the audit runs, day by day
- 1
Kickoff and discovery (days 1-4)
Interviews with engineering and product, plus a first pass through your existing test documentation and tooling.
- 2
Independent analysis (days 5-8)
A structured review against all six audit domains, without sitting in on your day-to-day so findings stay objective.
- 3
Report writing (days 9-12)
Findings get written up with severity ratings and turned into a prioritized, sequenced roadmap.
- 4
Findings presentation (days 13-14)
A walkthrough of the report with your team, and a working session on what to tackle first.
Deliverables
What you get from the audit
Executive summary
The headline findings, written for whoever is making the budget and headcount calls.
Detailed findings by domain
Every finding rated by severity, with a recommended action attached.
Coverage gap analysis
Exactly where testing is not happening, mapped against actual product risk.
90-day roadmap
Ten to fifteen sequenced initiatives, ranked by impact against effort, so quick wins and structural fixes are both visible.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Related from Services
API TestingMore in QA Consulting
Ready to find out exactly where quality is breaking down?
Tell us about your team and your current release process. We will scope a two-week audit in one call.